Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Who Did 9/11’ Category

Let’s just blame the Muslims for 9/11, paint them as terrorists, invade their countries, kill their children, destroy their cities, take their resources, kill them, and piss on their dead bodies. Sounds like a plan.

As we all know, priests are the most evil enemies to have–why should it be so? Because they are the most impotent. It is their impotence makes their hate so violent and sinister, so cerebral and poisonous. The greatest haters of history–but also the most intelligent haters–have been the priests. Besides the brilliance of priestly vengeance all other brilliance fails. Human history would be a dull and stupid thing without the intelligence furnished by its impotents. Whatever else has been done to damage the powerful and great of this earth seems trivial compared with what the Jews have done, that priestly people who succeeding themselves in avenging themselves on their enemies and oppressors by radically inverting all their values, that is, by an act of the most spiritual vengeance. –Nietzsche

Zionist neoconservatives planned regime change years before 9/11 for seven Muslim countries including Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan, Somalia. Mossad conducted both USS Cole and 9/11, and they blamed bin Laden to extend aggression to Afghanistan, placed and killed bin Laden in Pakistan to do the same to Pakistan. This was a Zionist post-Soviet power play. In fact what you are seeing right now is the Israelification of America where the police state repression techniques used on Palestinians are returning to America.

Acts of monstrous criminality –such as 9/11– stand on their own.

Let us not forget that the American empire invaded Iraq in 2003 on the basis of 9/11 and fabrications of ‘weapons of mass destruction’ destroying the country and killing around 655,000 civilians according to a Lancet survey of 2006, and Exxon, Occidental, Shell, and BP essentially took control of Iraqi oil in 20-year contracts.  The actual murder and mayhem caused by the American army in Iraq is clear from both examples of wanton and gleeful murders as well as accounts of veterans.  A video footage released 11 January 2012 shows US Marines urinating on the dead bodies of their victims.  In any case, in Pakistan alone, the drones have killed 2373-2997 of which 391-780, or between 16-26% were civilians, and 175 were children.

Philip Zelikow headed the 9/11 Commission. “Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? I’ll tell you what I think the real threat [is] and actually has been since 1990 – it’s the threat against Israel,” Zelikow told a crowd at the University of Virginia on September 10, 2002, speaking on a panel of foreign policy experts assessing the impact of September 11 and the future of the war on al-Qaeda.

Mossad conducted 9/11 as well as USS Cole. The high-fiving Israelis knew before anyone else that this was a planned attack rather than an accident, and they pointed FBI to Palestinians. Bin Laden was blamed strategically, to widen stretch of attack across the Middle East, and he was conveniently killed and perhaps placed by the US without notifying Pakistan to implicate Pakistan as well. The Zionist neoconservatives were planning a mass regime change sweep that included Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia but by blaming bin Laden they could also creep eastward to Afghanistan and Pakistan. There won’t be a ‘nuclear-free’ Middle East unless these criminals are pulled from running the American empire.

The FBI investigator in charge of the USS Cole attack in Yemen, John O’Neill, was pulled from the case at the behest of ambassador Bodin, who is Jewish, after having suspected a Mossad operation there and he was killed after two days of work in New York during 9/11.

Especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence that they purport to condemn.

I must thank Ms. Sarah Palin for the brilliant piece of rhetoric above that I stole shamelessly.  Before elaboration, let me say immediately that it is abundantly clear to me by now, late November 2011, that 9/11 was a showcasing of remote-controlled aircraft technology much in vogue now by the American planetary military empire.  In fact, on March 2001, six months before the event, Fox aired the pilot of the Lone Gunmen where remote-controlled aircrafts were used fictionally on the Twin Towers.  There is an account of Dov Zakheim who co-authored a position paper for The Project for a New American Century which included the necessity of a Pearl Harbor-like episode to begin a post-Soviet American military assertion who also worked in a company that sold remote-controlled airplane technology.  Some people have made the case that it was purely a Mossad job.  Alan Sabrosky, who taught at US Army War College wrote an article that originally appeared on Veterans Today but was removed, and can still be found here.  On January 30, 2012 I was stunned to hear allegations that USS Cole, previously attributed to al Qaeda, was an Israeli operation.  I also found some details that show the Zionist network in the 9/11 false flag and in case the site was taken down here is a copy someone made. During the time that the planes hit the towers, a group of Israelis were found high-fiving and celebrating who told FBI that “We are not your problem.  Your problem is our problem, which is the Palestinians,” which means that they were aware that this was a ‘terror attack’ rather than an accident.  They repeatedly failed lie-detector tests and were incarcerated for 71 days and then under pressure from the Israeli government released.   There certainly is not much moral difference between the drone operators and those who committed 9/11, as the former seem to kill large groups of people without knowing who they are.

It is also relevant to note that the history of American empire is replete with false flags to begin wars, so much so that it could be considered a standard strategy for US to begin wars to gain the support of the Congress and the American people.  For example, although the attack on Pearl Harbor was considered a surprise attack, it wasn’t.  Franklin Roosevelt knew three days before of the attack, and the US Secretary of War, Henry Stimson wrote in his diary ten days before the Attack on Pearl Harbor: [Roosevelt] brought up the event that we are likely to be attacked perhaps next Monday … and the question was what we should do. The question was how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves.  Here is a presentation of these historical examples.

Another important issue that need to be addressed is the widespread belief reinforced by such luminaries of empire as the New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman that suicide terror is a specifically Islamic brand of violence whose only logic is some sort of religious belief.  This is false.  Sri Lanka’s Tamil separatists have employed suicide terror as well and they are not Muslim.  University of Chicago professor Robert Pape has distilled the logic of suicide terror as a strategy employed by agents against occupation by ‘modern democratic armies’ of territory they consider homeland.  While al Qaeda and other Islamist militants had interest in an Islamist political organization in the Middle East, they are not irrational and had no strategic gains by an atrocity against civilians in America.  It is interesting to note two facts about Iraq: first, there was never a suicide terror incident in Iraq before the US invasion of 2003; second, instead of apprehending bin Laden for trial, there was a decision to assassinate him which raises suspicions about the issue of his involvement which he denied publicly, which I shall return to.

The fact that the Israel-centric neoconservative cabal that took over the National Security State apparatus well before 9/11 with explicit plans for regime change around the Muslim world, including Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, gives the thesis of 9/11 as a false flag fairly strong backing.  Perhaps the real reason for people to deny 9/11 as a false flag, beyond accepting the extremely flawed official accounts, is to preserve some moral authority for the future.  But this particular event has already produced cognitive dissonance that is far more intense than the successful repression of the emotional effects of the Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombing whose details were hidden from the American public for a very long period.

The events in America on September 11, 2001 have reverberated throughout the world in a thousand ways.  Everyone has their own theories of what happened and hundreds of people have claimed authoritative theories of the events and how they relate to political events around the world.  All this is not surprising, as an event of this magnitude is sure to generate speculations, conjectures, theories, rumors, claims to authoritative knowledge by a thousand parties.  I don’t find this event as endlessly fascinating as many others but I have deep convictions about a few points about this event, which I believe are important, on which I have spent a great deal of research, and which I think are of sufficient importance to my own views and the truth in general that I am willing to make my claims be known publicly.

On 9/11 I was in New York. I couldn’t get a job for a year because of my name. A Jewish friend supported me financially but I had to move to California finally to find a job. I only realized in 2008 that there was a serious problem. Now it’s all very clear to me of course.

Here are my positions on this event, and I will try to back these up with evidence:

  • Neither al Qaeda nor any Muslims had anything to do with the events of 9/11 and the entire event was a western conspiracy
  • The major reason for the planning and execution of the 9/11 events were to secure a future for the American military and economic power in a new era that began with the end of the Cold War which ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union

These claims are obviously controversial but I happen to believe them to be true, and I want to tell you some key points that makes me believe these to be true, regardless of whether these facts compel anyone else to agree with me or not.

  • Many of the 9/11 ‘hijackers’ were protesting their innocence after the alleged suicide attacks

On September 23 2001, the BBC reports that one of the alleged hijackers, Waleed al Shehri was protesting his innocence of the crime from Casablanca, Morocco.

  • Bin Laden himself denied involvement

Bin Laden was assassinated on May 2, 2011 by Navy Seal Team 6, unarmed with great jubilation in parts of the world. To this day, there has been no hard evidence linking him to 9/11. He also happened to have explicitly denied involvement in an interview soon after the event.  Although the American media has generally obscured this fact, here is a CNN article where this denial is reported.  In December   2001, there was a video released to the media which allegedly showed bin Laden boasting about his masterminding of the plot but this is a fake video as FBI records show that bin Laden was left-handed while he is writing a note with his right hand.  A leading expert on bin Laden had gone on record to say that this confession video is fake.  Indeed, there were even admission by CIA that videos had been faked.  More problems with this so-called confession can be found in this note.

From Michel Chodussovsky’s research, I have learned also that bin Laden was recruited for a US sponsored jihad during 1979 at age 22 for Operation Cyclone and trained at a CIA sponsored guerrilla training camp.  There has been some controversy about this claim.  One of the most expensive US intelligence operations from 1979 in Afghanistan, Operation Cyclone, involved US support for mujahideen against Russia-supported communist government.  US officials say that they supported the native Afghan mujahideen but not the Arab Afghan fighters who also joined the resistance which Saudi Arabia might have supported financially.  The issue is fairly irrelevant to the point of this note, which is that neither bin Laden nor al Qaeda had anything to do with 9/11, whatever were their other terrorist acts in Eurasia.  Here is a denial of any CIA funding to bin Laden directly.  One has to put the fine hair-splitting of the US support for native Afghan mujahideen and the Saudi Arabian support for Arab mujahideen which included bin Laden into perspective, for Saudi Arabia is a client state of the American empire and the hair splitting is done to protect the CIA from domestic criticism for those who actually believe that al Qaeda and bin Laden were the perpetrators of 9/11.

The fact that these enormously pertinent facts were not advertised by the western news media at the time loudly is a disturbing phenomenon and by themselves point to the possibility that 9/11 was a false flag operation.  After all, we know now that the Gulf of Tonkin incident, which alleged that the Vietnamese fired torpedoes at a US destroyer, which was used by the US as a reason to invade Vietnam, was a fabrication.  Here is Robert McNamara admitting to this.

First, let us consider the events in New York.  Three skyscrapers collapsed in the World Trade Center on 9/11/01.  Not only the extremely well known North and South Towers, after two aircrafts hit these buildings, but also a third building, Building 7.  A video of the collapse of this third building can be found here, and shows clearly that it collapsed not for any object or problems towards the top of the building.  Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth had produced a great deal of detailed analyses for the contention that this building was demolished.  Here, for example, you can see the analysis to show that the collapse of the building was nearly free-fall for the first few seconds.

The natural conjecture is that it was because of a destructive force of some sort acting on its base.  An experienced chemist from Copenhagen, Niels Harrit, had found nanothermite in the wreckage which is incindiary that requires specialized technology and he believes that the demolition was deliberately conducted.

The two aircrafts that hit the two towers are purported to be American Airlines 175 and United Airlines 11, both of which are Boeing 767.  It can be established that the first was travelling at around 950 km/hour and the second at around 800 km/hour by various methods merely from the hundreds of videos that are available of the event.  According to the manufacturers of these aircrafts, Boeing, the model 767 would have dismembered at speeds above 660 km/hour travelling near sea level in thick air, as would be the case for them to approach these towers.  This fact alone is sufficient for me to disbelieve that these aircrafts were actually Boeing 767.  A more detailed analysis of this issue was pursued by Pilots for 9/11 Truth.  The remote-controlled planes theory was put forth already by 2002.  More recently I found that not only are there remote-control technologies for passenger aircrafts but that Dov Zakheim, a co-author of the PNAC position paper entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” which appeared in September 2000 and mentioned the need for a “new Pearl Harbor” was directly involved in SPC Corporation which sold such remote-control technologies with the capability of controlling up to eight passenger aircrafts by remote control simultaneously.  The fact that the five high-fiving Israelis apprehended nearby told the FBI that “We are Israelis.  We are not your problem.  Your problem is our problem.  The Palestinians are your problems.” before they could have known that this was not merely an accident but a deliberate attack in itself raises suspicions.  A sharper presentation of some of these issues was put together by Robert Rice.

There is another issue which does not prove anything particularly but gives sense to this, which is that many of the remote controlled aircraft technologies currently in use, for example the RQ-170 Sentinel used to kill bin Laden and others were developed in a top secret military base called Area 51 on which there is new information.  A perfectly reasonable theory of technicalities is that the planes were especially developed aircraft to showcase the new war technologies in the arsenal of Empire.  The drone business is a lucrative $4o billion business that has its history with the Israeli engineer Adam Karem who began working on the first prototypes in early 1980s in California.

Once I disbelieve that they are 767 then the natural conjecture is that they are military aircrafts.  When I then note that the company responsible for security of the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport was Securacom, one of whose principals at the time was Marvin P. Bush, who is the brother of President George Bush, I am not comforted.

A fairly interesting set of arguments that eliminate the official account of the part of 9/11 story which suggest that the demolition of the buildings were due to the missile-planes suggest a different mechanism for the demolitions.

Finally, there is a video recording of an alleged passenger who was able to make a last minute desperate phone call to his mother where he repeated his full name a few times.  Just as a human being, I simply cannot believe that this behavior is possible from a person making his last phonecall to his mother.  I immediately suspect that this is a fake computerized voice recording that is being fed to the public.

The above three things, without reference to any other facts about 9/11 are sufficient for me to conclude that it was not only a false flag operation but a false flag operation scripted by third rate dramatists.  After this conclusion, I am not only not compelled by the official story but have certainty that it makes no sense to assume any involvement by Muslims or al Qaeda at all.  If indeed it was a false flag operation planned by folks who had resources of the American and Israeli intelligence and military at their disposal, why would they jeopardize what is quite an important operation to be disrupted by involvement of any radical Muslim groups?

SPECULATIONS ON WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED

“Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was a Jewish-German émigré from the Nazi regime who eventually landed at the University of Chicago where he developed a following that has achieved enormous prominence in American politics. Among his students were Paul Wolfowitz who has openly acknowledged that he is a follower of Straus as has the godfather of neconservatism, Irving Kristol. Irving Kristol begat William Kristol, the director of operation for the DC neocons, editor of the Weekly Standard and “chairman” of the Project for the New American Century, which laid out the plans for the Iraq War. (PNAC also opined in 2000 that a Pearl Harbor-like event would be necessary to take the country to war, and one year later, presto, we had the strange and still mysterious attack of September 11.)

For his part Paul Wolfowitz begat Libby, in the intellectual sense, when he taught Libby at Yale. Others stars in the necon firmament are Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and lesser figures like Abram Shulsky, director of the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans, created by Donald Rumsfeld. Shulsky, also a student of Strauss, was responsible for fabricating the lies masquerading as intelligence that were designed to get the U.S. into the war on Iraq. While the neocons have a passion for the Likud party and Zionism, they also count among their number not a few pre-Vatican II Catholics and an assortment of cranks like Newt Gingrich and John Bolton and crypto fascists like Jeanne Kirkpatrick. The list goes on and Justin Raimondo has documented it in great detail over the years on Antiwar.com. But it is enough to note that Cheney’s alter ego was Libby, and Rumsfeld’s second in command until recently was Wolfowitz. So both Cheney, the de facto president with an apparently ill perfused cerebrum, and the geezer commanding the Pentagon have been managed by younger and very prominent Straussians for the past five years.” (from John Walsh’s article)

The considerations above are sufficient to remove from this tangled problem the involvement or bin Laden or al Qaeda or indeed any Muslim radical groups in the 9/11 false flag operation.  Indeed, just to reinforce this point, bin Laden was interviewed days after the event by the Pakistani newspaper Ummat, where he quite clearly denies involvement with it.  I tend to believe him just because he is a radical Wahhabi and leaders of such groups tend to claim credit for their activities.  Let us dismiss, then, for the moment, all the theories about and the suspects and intricacies involving radical Muslim groups, for they are all distractions.

The more interesting question to me are the strategic goals of the top level planners of 9/11, because such an extensive operation makes little sense to undertake for anyone without an expansive and long term goal.  Two documents are interesting to me from this question.  First, it is clear that 9/11 allowed America to invade Eurasia with the full backing of Europe and many other nations.

Indeed, George Bush was able to force through Congress not only an attack on Afghanistan where they decided the red herring perpetrator was, but also Iraq, which even by the false flag operation had nothing to do with 9/11.  The dual attacks are useful strategically partly because they flank Iran, which America controlled until 1979 with the puppet government of the Shah, achieved by the CIA coup in 1953 but whose control was lost with the Islamic Revolution there.  It had since fallen under the Russia-Chinese sphere of influence and even today provides around 10% or so of the Chinese oil demand.  They had begun developing nuclear technology for a while but stopped work on a nuclear weapons program in the fall of 2003, which was reported to George Bush during November 2007 but the accusation and the propaganda did not stop even after the election of Barack Obama.

Obama administration had made it a top priority to attempt to squeeze Iran by UN Security Council sanctions last year which Russia and China watered down before agreement and Turkey and Brazil provided dissenting voice.  But Obama had put unilateral American sanctions and asked European nations also to put additional economic sanctions.  Isreal and America sent carriers and warships in joint exercises in the Persian Gulf to put pressure on Iran, which led to Ahmadinejad on 23 September 2010 to ask for a reinvestigation of 9/11 because he claimed, and I agree personally, that statesmen in most nations believe that 9/11 was an American false flag operation.  There is a great many Americans who also want a new investigation of the events surrounding 9/11.

Even more recently, WikiLeaks made public internal cables from embassies across the world to the US State Department that give intimate details of American Imperial diplomacy around the world, including some that show that the Gulf Arab monarchies were encouraging an attack on Iran along with the public incitement of Israel.  Indeed, Israel recently called for an attack on Iran openly that was defused by Robert Gates.

All this was the aftermath of 9/11, but the planning of these events went back much earlier.  We can find that Paul Wolfowitz already outlined a new doctrine after the collapse of the Soviet Union calling for a ways to ensure a one-superpower world.  Later on, the Project for the New American Century produced the document “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” written just a year before 9/11/01, during September 2000 which outlines an aggressive future for America’s military role in the world.  Of course, given the end of the Cold War, the natural alternative would have been to reduce military expenses rather than increase them.

My natural belief from the evidence I have presented and some other theories I know about, such as the detailed theory presented by those who created the “documentary” Loose Change, is that 9/11 was an American Big Lie.  Indeed, since I am certain that Muslim extremist groups had nothing to do with the events simply by the evaluation of evidence that I had considered myself, it cannot be anything but a Big Lie in the Hitlerian sense.    This would not be the first time the rulers of the American Empire had applied a Big Lie to the American public: Holocaust, which had a great deal of injustice and suffering in reality, was also massively exaggerated by Stalin’s propaganda, and although the Nuremberg trials removed some of the more outrageous portions, like claims that the Germans made soap from Jewish fat and other montrously ridiculous claims, the remainder of the Holocaust story still had outrageous propaganda — it is impossible that 11 million were killed in the concentration camps as David Cole’s work shows.  During the end of the second world war, in 1945 the Americans not only bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki but Eisenhower ordered the massacre of around a million German prisoners of war.  The acceptance of the Holocaust myth was partly, one would imagine, to ease the process of setting up a new Pax Americana.  Thus it is not difficult for me to accept the 9/11 as an American Big Lie.

Now let us go back in time to the so-called Cold War era for some perspective.  Here is a map of Eurasia.

If we scroll eastward so that we can see Afghanistan and Pakistan more clearly the map is this.

I like to point out the obvious, for sometimes the obvious is not clear to me and not mentioned in newspapers often enough.  Iran is large and central to the region flanked by Iraq to the west and Afghanistan and Pakistan to the East.  Southwest from Persian Gulf of Iran is Saudi Arabia.

If we go back to early 1979, say January, we could classify each state by alignment with America or Soviets.  Saudi Arabia was essentially an American oil field from the 1930s whose absolute monarchy was protected by America all along.  Iran had, since the 1953 CIA coup had been under the repressive regime of the Shah, who was an American puppet government.  Afghanistan to the east had a communist government.

The strategic interest of both Americans and their opponents in the Cold War that was provoked by America by this time was being contested.  It was a surprise that the Islamic Revolution succeeded in regime change in Iran in April 1979 and the American reaction was to attempt a balance to the east by helping the mujahideen in Afghanistan topple the communist government, and the CIA went in to help in July 1979 six months before Russia invaded Afghanistan in December 1979.  Russia occupied Afghanistan until 1987 leaving the land devastated.

The 9/11 false flag operation that demonized Muslims to the American public is a fairly obvious ploy by the same cabal who had fabricated the Cold War and the nuclear arms race for the human race.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »