ON WHY CAPITALISM WITH NO REGULATION ON VISCOSITY CONTROL OF MONEY INTO MARKETS UNCHECKED CAN CAUSE TURBULENCE IN VOLATILITY
June 24, 2015 by zulfahmed
I’m not crazy at all. And I will love you forever. I know that because that’s what I’m like. Now let’s examine what volatility really is intuitively with the hydrodynamic analogy. What is low viscosity? Ha ha ha ha ha
Very good. It’s exactly excess money into a market. If Volatility is a hydrodynamic process, then when you INCREASE MONEY INTO A MARKET past a threshold whatever it may be — purely intuitively — that market will cross the viscosity threshold and become NATURALLY unstable.No wonder there’s no science of finance.
I hear ‘Universal Man’ beep in my head. Now we want to say that Ackerloff-Shiller’s Animal Spirits is a good clean un-ANTISEMITIC account of troubles of the ‘irrational exhuberance’ because it was JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER’s father-in-law (no I’m not gay come to visit San Franciso and we’ll fuck like pigeons I’m sure you’re hot) NELSON ALDRICH was sent to Europe to come back to form the Fed with much fanfare ending the nineteenth century liquidity crises, i.e. here Jews were not involved as primary decision-makers
My argument is that without a proper HYDRODYNAMIC type science for financial volatility it is impossible to understand that volatility is like flowing water and while the ideology of capitalism would suggest that more trading is better VISCOSITY going down a threshold as in Navier-Stokes will NECESSARILY cause turbulence in volatility. And the spill effects of this volatility will get Zulfikar Moinuddin Ahmed kicked out by greedy landlords looking for more dollars.
Think about it. CAPITALISM cannot be stable with an IDEOLOGY for markets because volatility is a NATURAL PROCESS and you can’t control turbulence without keeping viscosity under control in all markets.