The ‘war on terror’ is an elaborate construction and Sniegoski in The Transparent Cabal gives many details of Israeli contribution to its creation. Ehud Barak was one of the first people to respond to 9/11 on mass media describing a ‘global war on terror’. It is not very difficult to make the case that it was also of Zionist origin. The recent massacre in Gaza that killed around 900 civilians is the de facto end of the ‘war on terror’, and perhaps this is one of the significant contributions that I can make to the world having expended a substantial portion of my efforts since 2008 on the internet with geopolitical commentary. This is an insight that gives me some optimism regarding the turbulence of my life since 2001: that there is a deeper explanation for how the world had sunk into a hellish nightmare with this ‘war on terror’ not just for the Middle East but in random denigrating general treatment in America.
So what is the insight? It is the understanding that this Gaza massacre is the turning point for the ‘war on terror’ because the psychological barrier of Americans to overcoming the conditioned and rational aversion to the fear of being or being considered anti-Semitic is lowered sufficiently to accept the possibility that 9/11 was a Mossad operation which I think is the best explanation given what I have learned over the years. There are widespread protests by Americans including Jews in New York against Israel, which reinforces what was already clear for several years, that there is a deep rift between Jews and Zionism. What is new is that the idea that Mossad did 9/11 is not considered to be anti-Semitic by many people and in my opinion it is not: Mossad is an organ of Israel and does not represent Jews or ordinary Israelis any more than CIA represents ordinary Americans.
Americans will chew on the issue of Mossad involvement in 9/11 and the rest of the world will be chewing on whether Israel is worse than Nazi Germany. This latter is inevitable with concrete analogs in Nazi bombing of Guernica in 1937 and correspondent dehumanization. The main point of mine is that this is the de facto end of the ‘war on terror’ conceptually. The ‘war on terror’ was an idea that arose from Israel which is argued in Sniegoski’s book but is also evident from the Israelis arrested by FBI immediately after 9/11 who said that the Palestinians were the problem. This is an effort that needs continuous justification. Americans are war-weary and despite the massive destruction and casualties in Iraq for which Americans need to justify it to themselves (if they identify with nationalism) the life in the 9/11 truth movement suggests that there is a serious interest in uncovering the issues surrounding that event, which I believe will lead immediately to direct involvement of Mossad and Israel.
In these large-scale issues the idea of a conclusion from a detailed analysis is prohibitively expensive in terms of resources and effort of a single person but we can still stand on intelligent observations and deductions. Although Bush was the mouthpiece and figurehead for the ‘war on terror’, if we follow the interests and development of this direction we can see that the defense industry and imperial interests benefited generally from it but concretely we can see that Israel is the world’s capital of Homeland Security industries from the work of Shir Hever.